Looks like the NYTimes got cyber-religion.
After two-years of blocking off their money-columnists from non subscribers, and after two years (to the day, they say) of making any article more than two weeks old unavailable, the New York Times realized that this was not such a good idea.
Like people were not reading their columnists. And like the columnists didn’t like this so much, either.
But what happened instead, was I left the NY Times as my primary news source and turned to the Post. Even though I had already paid. Weird.
It was like as I was trying to keep track of my columnists and getting my money’s worth the Times lost value to me. I can’t say why, but it did.
So when time came for my renewal, I didn’t renew my subscription. I soon discovered that if there was a column that got my attention that I wanted to read, all I needed to do was search and I could find it.
The Times wants to regain those search eyeballs. Maybe I will read Dowd again. But maybe I have moved on.